9 . Const. P. 255/2025 (S.B.) Zubaida W/O Muhammad Irfan V/S Inspector General of Police (IGP) Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi The law enjoins the police to be scrupulously fair towards the offender and the Magistracy is to guarantee a fair investigation and fair trial for an offender. Unfortunately, these objectives have remained unfulfilled. Aberrations of police officers and police excesses in dealing with the law and order situation have been the subject of adverse comments from this Court along with from other courts Nonetheless they have did not have any corrective effect on it. The police has the power to arrest a person even without obtaining a warrant of arrest from a court. The plenty of this power casts an obligation around the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for your crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated.
It is also important to note that granting of seniority to the civil servant without the actual size of service nearly violates the whole service structure as being a civil servant inducted in Quality 17 by claiming these benefit without any experience be directly posted in almost any higher quality, which is neither the intention from the legislation nor with the equity. Read more
fourteen. From the light from the position explained over, it truly is concluded that a civil servant contains a fundamental right to be promoted even after his retirement by awarding proforma promotion; provided, his right of promotion accrued during his service but couldn't be thought of for no fault of his very own and In the meantime he retired on attaining the age of superannuation without any shortcoming on his part about deficiency during the size of service or from the form of inquiry and departmental action was so taken against his right of promotion. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Muhammad Karim Khan Agha, Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Creator) Source: Order: Downloads 433 Order Date: 24-JAN-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
The a lot of this power casts an obligation about the police and it must bear in mind, as held by this Court that if a person is arrested for the crime, his constitutional and fundamental rights must not be violated. However it is made apparent that police is free to choose action against any person who's indulged in criminal activities issue to law. 8. The DIGP concerned is directed to prioritize this matter and, after hearing both parties within two months, address the alleged police misconduct. If the officials are found culpable, departmental proceedings for their punishment must be initiated, and so they shall be assigned non-industry duties inside the interim period. Bench: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Adnan-ul-Karim Memon(Writer) Source: Order: Downloads 113 Order Date: 08-APR-twenty five Approved for Reporting WhatsApp
For that reason, the petition and any related applications are dismissed. The Petitioner must pursue his remedy through an appeal before the competent authority. If these types of an appeal has not yet been decided, it should be addressed. Following that decision, the Petitioner may well then look for further recourse before the Service Tribunal. Read more
These past decisions are called "case regulation", or precedent. Stare decisis—a Latin phrase meaning "let the decision stand"—will be the principle by which judges are bound to these kinds of past decisions, drawing on founded judicial authority to formulate their positions.
The Roes accompanied the boy to his therapy sessions. When they were advised with the boy’s past, they asked get more info if their children were Risk-free with him in their home. The therapist certain them that that they had very little to fret about.
eleven . Const. P. 1479/2024 (S.B.) Mst. Shir Bano and another V/S Province of Sindh and others Sindh High Court, Karachi Primarily, this is really a free and democratic nation, and once a person becomes a major she or he can marry whosoever he/she likes; In case the parents with the boy or Woman tend not to approve of these types of inter-caste or interreligious marriage the most they are able to do if they could Slice off social relations with the son or maybe the daughter, but they cannot give threats or commit or instigate for acts of violence and cannot harass the person who undergoes these kinds of inter-caste or inter-religious marriage. I therefore, direct that the administration/police authorities will see, if any boy or Lady who's major undergoes inter-caste or inter-religious marriage with a woman or person who's a major, the pair is neither harassed by any individual nor subjected to threats or acts of violence and anybody who offers such threats or harasses or commits acts of violence both himself or at his instigation, is taken to task by instituting criminal proceedings because of the police against this sort of persons and further stern action is taken against these types of person(s) as provided by law.
, which is Latin for “stand by decided matters.” This means that a court will be bound to rule in accordance with a previously made ruling on the same type of case.
Are you currently looking for Court Information? You need to use our site to search for just a case or search for any person. Information to the site is updated every 24 hours at 3:00 am. Please Note: Name and Case information found about the search site is provided to be used as reference material and is not the official court record.
The Cornell Legislation School website offers various information on legal topics, including citation of case law, as well as gives a video tutorial on case citation.
A year later, Frank and Adel have a similar dilemma. When they sue their landlord, the court must use the previous court’s decision in applying the law. This example of case law refers to two cases listened to while in the state court, within the same level.
Given that the Supreme Court could be the final arbitrator of all cases where the decision is achieved, therefore the decision of your Supreme Court needs to become taken care of as directed in terms of Article 187(2) of the Constitution. 10. We must dismiss these petitions because the Supreme Court has already ruled on this. Read more
Rulings by courts of “lateral jurisdiction” are usually not binding, but could possibly be used as persuasive authority, which is to present substance towards the party’s argument, or to guide the present court.